Issues with the NHEQF:
Multiplicity of Guidelines:
- The existence of both NHEQF and the National Credit Framework creates confusion.
- Institutions must also implement the Academic Bank of Credits separately, adding to the complexity.
Ambiguity:
- NHEQF lacks clear eligibility conditions and entry pathways. This can lead to confusion for students and institutions.
Lack of Consensus:
- Some disciplines like agriculture, law, medicine, and pharmacy aren’t included, leading to fragmentation. Consensus across regulatory bodies is needed for a cohesive system.
Degrees Within a Degree:
- The framework allows certain undergraduates with high CGPAs to enter Ph.D. programs, potentially fostering elitism.
Equating Postgraduate Diplomas and Undergraduate Programs:
- The NHEQF equates postgraduate diplomas with undergraduate programs, causing confusion, especially for programs with varying durations like B.Ed.
Influence of International Models:
- The NHEQF heavily draws from the European Bologna process and Dublin descriptors. India’s diverse higher education system needs broader consultations with Indian states for a more suitable framework.
The article is all about the National Higher Education Qualification Framework (NHEQF) to promote and regulate education globalization. Rishabh has penned this article, and it is a good current affairs Topic in governance. Our experienced mentor Dr. Bijendra Kumar Jha has reviewed the article and found it fine.
You can access the Daily Current Affairs for UPSC from the Plutus IAS website and effectively sharpen your government exam preparation.
